Karachi Agreement Related To

Part I of the agreement relates to the structure and operation of the “civil administration of the territory of Azad Kashmir,” which set the rules applicable to the cashmere Azad government. The second part dealt with financial arrangements that would allow Pakistan to present money. Part III is entitled “Division of Functions between the Governments of Pakistan, the Government of Azad Kashmir and the Muslim Conference.” [4] B. The delegations of India and Pakistan, duly authorized, reached the following agreement: Christopher Snedden says that the government of Azad Kashmir and the Muslim Conference accepted the agreement because they wanted Azad cashmere to join Pakistan, which they were expecting soon with the promised referendum. According to him, this relationship was similar to that of Pakistan with its other provinces. [6] The inhabitants of PoK and Gilgit-Baltistan have been discriminated against and persecuted for decades because of the distortion of policy and agreements reached by Islamabad. The 830-kilometre ceasefire line, established in the agreement, began at the southernest point of the Chenab River in Jammu. It took place in a rough arc to the north and then northeast to the coordinate of the NJ9842 maps, about 19 km north of the Shyok River. [6] However, Navnita Behera says that the joint secretary of the Kashmir ministry following the agreement has acquired “the best claim to be the true head of government of Asad Kashmir”. [7] The Karachi Agreement is an agreement allegedly reached on 28 April 1949 between the Pakistani government and the government of Azad Kashmir for relations between Pakistan and Azad Kashmir.

It defined the division of powers between the two governments and the All Jammu and Kashmir Muslim Conference. By the agreement, azad-cashmere gave the Pakistani government full control of Gilgit-Baltistan (then called “northern zones”) and control over defence, foreign policy and communication issues on its own territory. K. Each party will have 30 days from the date of ratification to evacuate the territories it currently occupies outside the current ceasefire line. Before the 30-day period expires, they must not travel to areas that must be supported by both parties in accordance with this agreement, except by mutual agreement between local commanders. With regard to the loss of Gilgit-Baltistan, Snedden Sardar Ibrahim accepts the argument that Azad Kashmir`s physical ties to Gilgit-Baltistan are weak. It was expected that Pakistan would manage it more easily via Peshawar or Rawalpindi. [6] However, in the years that followed, Azad Kaschmir tried to regain control of Gilgit-Baltistan through various means.

In 1972, the Azad Kashmir Legislative Assembly passed a resolution on the recovery of Gilgit-Baltistan. The intermediate constitution of Azad Kashmir, formulated in 1974, lists gilgit-Baltistan as part of Azad Kashmir. In 1992, the Azad Kashmir High Court admitted a petition and ordered that the government of Azad Kashmir take control of Gilgit-Baltistan. However, the order was challenged in the Supreme Court of Azad Kashmir, which overturned it, although he claimed that gilgit-Baltistan was part of Jammu and Kashmir. [8] The people of Gilgit-Baltistan would have been outraged by the Karachi agreement because there were no representatives of them who thought that the agreement was the fate of Gilgit-Baltistan. [9] “We reject all aspects (of the agreement) in fact, the entire Karachi agreement. Today, the circumstances are completely different from those of the time when the agreement was signed and if the Pakistani government is really serious about solving the problems of these two regions (Azad Kashmir and Gilgit-Baltistan), it should both remove the councils of Azad Kashmir and Gilgit-Baltistan and merge them into one appropriate representation of the two regions. Maqsood said.